Friday, December 7, 2007

Idiosyncratic ( + Annoyed) Thought No.3:

WhaT The HeLL iS The BiG DeaL WiTh NOT TeSTiNG oN aNiMaLs ??? Ma ThBa7ooNa ?? aND iSNT ThaT STUPID ??? WHaT, R u SPoSeD 2 TesT oN HUMANS ??? ThaTs SaFeR ? WeLa LeSS CRueL ?? WeLa Do TheSe aNiMaL RiGhT aDvoCaTe iDioTs WaNT LeSS eFFiCaciouS PRoDuCTs ?!


Do TheSe ppL ReaLLY BeLieve ThaT TheiR LiVeS DoNT DePeND oN ThiS ? PeNiciLLiN, oRGaN TRaNSPLaNTs, CaNCeR TReaTMeNTs, TesTiNG 4 TeRaToGeNics ((DruGs ThaT HaRM The FeTuS)) .. Yea LeTs aLL STaRT TesTiNG ThaT STuFF oN HuMaNs So We CaN SaVe The aNiMaLs CuZ oH TheYRe So CuTe N CuDDLY, BuT iF The HuMaNs Die iN The PRoCeSS .. WeLL TheY WeRe CRueL eNouGh 2 TesT oN aNiMaLs So TheY DeseRve iT No ???


aND HeRe i Was ThiNKiNG HuMaN RiGhTs WeRe MoRe iMPoRTaNT ThaN aNiMaL RiGhTs .. oH SiLLY Me !

2 comments:

Unknown said...

Unless human rights activists grow some balls, and get a big titted blonde to advocate for them, animals will have more rights. For more, see the south park episode about PETA cuz thats whats gonna happen soon ;)

atoona said...

LOL, thats so true. When i buy a product and it says "not tested on animals" i think: that better be tested on an animal b4 they test it on me!

don't get me wrong, i dont like animal cruelty, but something has to be sacrificed for the greater good. People can have no Common sense!